Cases 1 - 10 of 84
US v. Clinton Powell, Jr.
as 23-4110
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
CLINTON CORNELIUS POWELL, JR.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv03072
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1451 Immigration: Revocation of Citizenship
Strange v. Krause & Kinsman, DC LLP
as 5:2022cv00400
Plaintiff:
Clinton Strange
Defendant:
Krause & Kinsman, DC LLP
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
US v. Gregory Clinton
as 22-6824
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
GREGORY K. CLINTON
US v. Gregory Clinton
as 22-6446
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
GREGORY K. CLINTON
Strange v. Next Click Partners, LLC et al
as 3:2022cv00058
Plaintiff:
Clinton Strange
Defendant:
Next Click Partners, LLC and Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
US v. Gregory Clinton
as 22-6081
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
GREGORY K. CLINTON
Anchorage SNF, LLC et al v. Padilla et al
as 1:2022cv00166
Plaintiff:
Anchorage SNF, LLC d/b/a Anchorage Healthcare Center, Bel Pre Leasing Co, LLC d/b/a Bel Pre Healthcare Center, BLUE POINT SNF, LLC d/b/a BLUE POINT HEALTHCARE CENTER and others
Petitioner:
MARLBORO LEASING CO, LLC d/b/a FORESTVILLE HEALTHCARE CENTER
Defendant:
Lourdes R. Padilla and Dennis R. Schrader
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act - Civil Action for Deprivation of Rights
James Brown v. Gail Watts
as 21-7563
Petitioner / Appellant:
JAMES CLINTON BROWN
Respondent / Appellee:
DIRECTOR GAIL WATTS, JUDGE JAN ALEXANDER and STATES ATTORNEY LISA FOX DEVER
US v. David Creasman, II
as 21-4371
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
DAVID CLINTON CREASMAN, II
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
