Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Williams et al v. Nationstar Mortgage LLC
as 1:2024cv00613
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER WILLIAMS and LEISHA WILLIAMS
Defendant:
NATIONSTAR MORTGAGE LLC doing business as Mr. Cooper
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 2605 RESPA: Servicing of Mortgage Loans
Jones et al v. Nationstar Mortgage LLC et al
as 8:2023cv01316
Plaintiff:
Stanley Jones and Debra Jones
Defendant:
NationStar Mortgage LLC doing business as Mr. Cooper and CitiMortgage Corporation
Nationstar Mortgage, LLC v. Brantley et al
as 9:2023cv02052
Plaintiff:
Nationstar Mortgage, LLC doing business as Mr Cooper
Defendant:
Carolyn Brantley, The United States of America acting by and through its agency, The Secretary of Housing and Urban Development and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Foreclosure
Nationstar Mortgage LLC v. Mahoney et al
as 6:2022cv03915
Plaintiff:
Nationstar Mortgage LLC doing business as Mr Cooper
Defendant:
Derrick Mahoney and Willow Grove Homeowners Association Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Foreclosure
Mendoza et al v. Betch et al
as 1:2022cv00543
Plaintiff:
Cristian Mendoza, Maurice O'Brien, Mark D. Meyer and others
Defendant:
Irvin J. Betch and Patricia A. Betch
Interested Party:
Baltimore Home Wholesalers, LLC, Nationstar Mortgage, LLC doing business as Mr. Cooper Group, Inc, Christopher Marshall and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1444 Notice of Removal- Foreclosure
Lee et al v. Meyers, Esq. et al
as 1:2021cv01589
Defendant:
Diane S. Rosenberg, Rosenburg & Associates, NationStar Mortgage LLC doing business as Mr. Cooper and others
Plaintiff:
Marcia M. Lee and Heath Lee
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Price v. Bank of America, N.A. et al
as 2:2021cv00152
Defendant:
Bank of America, N.A., Does 1 To 50, Nationstar Mortgage, LLC doing business as Mr. Cooper and others
Plaintiff:
Alan Thomas Price
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
