Cases 11 - 20 of 28
MATHEWSON v. COOPER et al
as 1:2020cv00944
Defendant:
ROBERT LEON, GEORGE SOLOMON, ANGELA SINTEF and others
Plaintiff:
MELANIE MATHEWSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DARDEN v. COOPER et al
as 1:2020cv00947
Defendant:
ROBERT LEON, ANGELA SINTEF, KAREN STEINOUR and others
Plaintiff:
ERIC DARDEN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MATHEWSON v. COOPER et al
as 1:2020cv00951
Defendant:
ROBERT LEON, GEORGE SOLOMON, ANGELA SINTEF and others
Plaintiff:
GARRISON MATHEWSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SHANNON v. COOPER et al
as 1:2020cv00952
Defendant:
ROBERT LEON, GEORGE SOLOMON, KAREN STEINOUR and others
Plaintiff:
TAMMY SHANNON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SHANNON et al v. COOPER et al
as 1:2020cv00953
Defendant:
ROBERT LEON, KAREN STEINOUR, KENNETH LASSITER and others
Plaintiff:
ARNETTA SHEARD, TAMMY SHANNON and DYREL ROSA SHANNON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Clements et al v. Jackson
as 4:2018cv00010
Plaintiff:
Kim E. Clements, Robin Photiou, Ronald Payne and others
Defendant:
Crystal Jackson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
FREEMAN v. BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY et al
as 1:2018cv00046
Plaintiff:
TERESA ANN FREEMAN
Defendant:
BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY, ASTRAZENECA PHARMACEUTICALS LP and MCKESSON CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Freeman v. Everingham
as 1:2015cv00277
Plaintiff:
Michael Charles Freeman
Defendant:
Melvin Ronald Everingham, II
Cause Of Action: 23 U.S.C. § 134
Brigham et al v. Patla, Straus, Robinson & Moore, P.A. et al
as 1:2015cv00069
Plaintiff:
Dana P. Brigham and Patricia M. Brigham
Defendant:
Patla, Straus, Robinson & Moore, P.A. , Steven I. Goldstein and Robert A. Freeman, III
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Baker et al v. Murphy-Brown, LLC
as 7:2014cv00227
Plaintiff:
John Baker , Betty Baker , Mackie Baker and others
Defendant:
Murphy-Brown, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
