Cases 31 - 40 of 79
Sherman v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2015cv14677
Plaintiff:
Melissa Sherman
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. , Johnson & Johnson and Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hawkes et al v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2015cv13995
Plaintiff:
Carolyn Hawkes and Sherman Hawkes
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Stearns et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2015cv13503
Plaintiff:
Wanda Stearns and Sherman Clint Stearns
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Sherman et al v. C. R. Bard, Inc.
as 2:2015cv11913
Plaintiff:
Susan Sherman and Thomas Sherman
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Stromen et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2015cv08699
Plaintiff:
Mary R. Stromen and Sherman Stromen
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Sherman v. Mentor Worldwide LLC et al
as 2:2015cv07518
Plaintiff:
Bernadette Sherman
Defendant:
Mentor Worldwide LLC and Coloplast Corp.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Larisa Galstian et al v. Pfizer Inc. et al
as 2:2015cv01912
Plaintiff:
Larisa Galstian, Margie Wright, Lucile Mercer and others
Defendant:
Pfizer Inc, McKesson Corporation and Does 1-50
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Product Liability
Sherman et al v. American Medical Systems, Inc.
as 2:2015cv05509
Plaintiff:
Alison Sherman and David Sherman
Defendant:
American Medical Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Sherman v. C. R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2015cv05278
Plaintiff:
Carol Sherman
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc., Ethicon Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Batten et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2015cv04672
Plaintiff:
Cynthia Batten and Sherman Genell Batten
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
