Cases 31 - 40 of 67
Bertrand Essem v. Jude Sone
as 14-1980
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BERTRAND M. ESSEM
Defendant - Appellee:
JUDE SONE and ENTERPRISE LEASING COMPANY OF NORFOLK/RICHMOND, LLC
Richmond v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2014cv20981
Plaintiff:
Leigh Richmond
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Richmond v. American Medical Systems, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv20142
Plaintiff:
Debra Richmond
Defendant:
American Medical Systems, Inc. , Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Richmond v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2014cv14648
Plaintiff:
Tammy S. Richmond
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Good et al v. Etowah River Terminal, L.L.C. et al
as 2:2014cv11011
Plaintiff:
Lori Good , Jessica Good , Kathleen Hardin and others
Defendant:
Etowah River Terminal, L.L.C., Chemstream Holdings, Inc., Gary Southern and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Richmond v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv10486
Plaintiff:
Tina Richmond
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Richmond v. American Medical Systems, Inc.
as 2:2014cv06051
Plaintiff:
Cynthia Lynn Richmond
Defendant:
American Medical Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Richmond et al v. C. R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv05780
Plaintiff:
Patricia Richmond and Kelly B. Richmond
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc. , Sofradim Production SAS and Tissue Science Laboratories Limited
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Richmond et al v. American Medical Systems, Inc.
as 2:2014cv05698
Plaintiff:
Jerry D. Richmond and Larry J. Richmond
Defendant:
American Medical Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Richmond v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2014cv04287
Plaintiff:
Cindy Y. Richmond
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
