Cases 41 - 50 of 51
Estela Lebron v. Donald Rumsfeld
as 11-6480
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ESTELA LEBRON, for herself and as Mother and Next Friend of Jose Padilla and JOSE PADILLA
Defendant - Appellee:
DONALD H. RUMSFELD, Former Secretary of Defense, CATHERINE T. HANFT, Former Commander Consolidated Brig, MELANIE A. MARR, Former Commander Consolidated Brig and others
Defendant:
JOHN ASHCROFT, Former Attorney General, ROBERT M. GATES, Secretary of Defense in his official and individual capacities, MICHAEL H. MOBBS, Special Advisor to Undersecretary of Defense for Policy and others
Eid v. Lacobucci et al
as 1:2011cv00591
Plaintiff:
Mary L. Eid
Defendant:
Bruce Lacobucci , Clifford H. Funk , Patricia Samuels and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Trexler et al v. Privette et al
as 3:2009cv02172
Plaintiff:
Hazelene E Trexler and Terry A Trexler
Defendant:
Michael R Privette, Lari Stokes, Katy Carouthers and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Berrett v. Administrative Law Judge of Prince George's County et al
as 8:2009cv01645
Plaintiff:
Robert Carlyle Berrett
Defendant:
Administrative Law Judge of Prince George's County, Hovey Johnson, The Estate of the Late Hovey Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Estate of Peola Wingfield v. Jack Freund
as 09-1503
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ESTATE OF PEOLA WINGFIELD, DECEASED, By and Through His Administratrix, Edna K. Thompson
Defendant - Appellee:
JACK FREUND, M.D., Individually and In His Official Capacity as Medical Director for the Division of Medical Services for the Jail, RICHARD E. CURTIS, JR., M.D., Individually, WILLIAM RHOADES, Dr., PH.D., Individually and In His Official Capacity as Psychologist and Employee of the Richmond City Jail and others
Defendant - None:
MICHELLE B. MITCHELL, Individually and In Her Official Capacity as Sheriff of the City of Richmond, DR. CHANG, M.D., Individually and In His Official Capacity as an Employee of the Richmond City Jail, ZELDA JOHNSON, M.D., Individually and In His Official Capacity as an Employee of the Richmond City Jail and others
Jane Doe v. South Carolina Department of S
as 08-2161
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JANE DOE, by and through her guardians Gregory and Michelle Johnson, GREGORY JOHNSON, MICHELLE JOHNSON and others
Defendant - Appellee:
SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES, SCDSS, DEBBY THOMPSON, ELIZABETH G. PATTERSON, Director and others
Defendant - None:
KAMERSON SETH COX, TITSA M. FLESCH, HEALTHY MINDS, LLC and others
Harold Hodge, Jr. v. Calvert County Public Schools
as 08-1256
Plaintiff - Appellant:
HAROLD H. HODGE, JR., next of kin and friends of B.N.H. and B.S.H. and CHANTE' N. HODGE, next of kin or friends of B.N.H. and B.S.H.
Defendant - Appellee:
CALVERT COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS, ROBERT L. GRAY, CCPS, Board Member President, ROBIN WELSH, CCPS, Assistant Superintendent and others
Hatfill v. New York Times Co
as 07-1124
Plaintiff - Appellant:
STEVEN J. HATFILL
Defendant - Appellee:
THE NEW YORK TIMES COMPANY
Defendant:
NICHOLAS KRISTOF
Amicus Supporting Appellee:
AMERICAN BROADCASTING COMPANIES, INCORPORATED, ALM MEDIA, INCORPORATED, THE ASSOCIATED PRESS and others
CACI Premier Tech v. Rhodes
as 06-2140
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CACI PREMIER TECHNOLOGY, INCORPORATED and CACI INTERNATIONAL, INCORPORATED
Defendant - Appellee:
RANDI RHODES and PIQUANT, LLC, d/b/a Air America Radio
Amicus Supporting Appellee:
ALM MEDIA, INCORPORATED, THE ASSOCIATED PRESS, COX COMMUNICATIONS, INCORPORATED and others
Ayres v. Mayor and City Cncl
as 06-1826
Plaintiff - Appellant:
AMBER L. AYRES, individually and as wife and guardian of the person and property of and RICHARD C. AYRES, a Disabled Adult
Defendant - Appellee:
MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL, OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
DAN TANGHERLINI, Director, District of Columbia Department of Transportation, DARRELL LAMONT SELLERS, NORMAN Y. MINETA, Secretary, United States Department of Transportation and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
