Torts - Injury Cases filed in the Fourth Circuit Courts
Cases 41 - 50 of 100
Olds et al v. Smith & Nephew, Inc.
as 1:2019cv02808
Defendant: SMITH & NEPHEW BIRMINGHAM HIP RESURFACING (BHR) HIP IMPLANT PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION and Smith & Nephew, Inc.
Plaintiff: Carla M Olds and John G Olds
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Gordon v. Smith & Nephew, Inc.
as 1:2019cv02687
Defendant: SMITH & NEPHEW BIRMINGHAM HIP RESURFACING (BHR) HIP IMPLANT PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION and Smith & Nephew, Inc.
Plaintiff: Sandra Gordon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Miller v. Smith & Nephew, Inc.
as 1:2019cv00475
Plaintiff: Margaret Miller
Defendant: SMITH & NEPHEW BIRMINGHAM HIP RESURFACING (BHR) HIP IMPLANT PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION and Smith & Nephew, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
In the Matter of the Complaint of Sagepost LLC et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2018cv03544
Petitioner: Sage Sailing Inc, In the Matter of the Complaint of Sagepost LLC and Sage Sailing Inc an Owner of a 2009 Sea Doo GTI 130 and a Maxxon Inflatable Boat, and an Owner Pro Hac Vice of a 1996 Premium 28 Parasail Boat, for Exoneration from or Limitation of Liability doing business as Ocean Watersports
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 30511
Daly v. Smith & Nephew, Inc.
as 1:2018cv03948
Plaintiff: Mr. Jesse Daly and Jesse Daly
Defendant: SMITH & NEPHEW BIRMINGHAM HIP RESURFACING (BHR) HIP IMPLANT PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION and Smith & Nephew, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
In Re Aqueous Film-Forming Foams Products Liability Litigation MDL 2873
as 2:2018mn02873
In Re: Aqueous Film-Forming Foams Products Liability Litigation
Defendant: Tyco Fire Products LP, Chemguard Inc, Defendants Co-Lead Counsel and others
Plaintiff: Plaintiffs Co-Lead Counsel, Plaintiffs Liaison Counsel, Plaintiffs and others
Intervenor: Lower Passaic River Study Area Cooperating Parties Group
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Culver et al v. Smith & Nephew, Inc.
as 1:2018cv03634
Plaintiff: Mayra Culver and Charles Culver
Defendant: SMITH & NEPHEW BIRMINGHAM HIP RESURFACING (BHR) HIP IMPLANT PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION and Smith & Nephew, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Schuett v. In re: Smith & Nephew Birmingham Hip Resurfacing (BHR) Hip Implant Products Liability Litigation
as 1:2018cv02975
Defendant: Smith & Nephew Birmingham Hip Resurfacing (BHR) Hip Implant Products Liability Litigation, In re: Smith & Nephew Birmingham Hip Resurfacing (BHR) Hip Implant Products Liability Litigation and Smith & Nephew, Inc.
Plaintiff: David Schuett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
v. Schuett et al
as 1:2018cv02974
Defendant: David Schuett and In re: Smith & Nephew Birmingham Hip Resurfacing (BHR) Hip Implant Products Liability Litigation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hart et al v. Biomet Inc et al
as 5:2018cv00118
Plaintiff: Susan Hart and Edward C Hart
Defendant: Biomet Orthopedics, LLC and Biomet Inc.
In Re: Biomet M2a Magnum Hip Implant Products Liability Litigation (MDL 2391)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?