Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Unger v. INOVA Health Care Services et al
as 1:2024cv00619
Plaintiff:
JEFFREY MARC UNGER
Defendant:
INOVA Health Care Services, ANH-PHOUNG T LE, INOVA Health Care Services doing business as INOVA General Internal Medicine Clinic and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Medical Malpractice
Jeffrey v. INOVA Health Care Services et al
as 1:2024cv00618
Plaintiff:
JULIANNE MARIE JEFFREY
Defendant:
INOVA Health Care Services, ANH-PHOUNG T LE, INOVA Health Care Services doing business as INOVA General Internal Medicine Clinic and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Medical Malpractice
CORBINO v. HEALTH CARE SERVICES GROUP
as 1:2021cv00462
Defendant:
HEALTH CARE SERVICES GROUP
Plaintiff:
DEBRA CORBINO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Colosi v. Mission Health Care Services, et al
as 1:2018cv00064
Plaintiff:
Joseph Edward Colosi
Defendant:
Mission Health Care Services, Asheville Radiology Associates PA, Carolina Internal Medicine Associates, PA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
O'Leary v. Simply Thick, LLC et al
as 1:2013cv01015
Plaintiff:
Melissa C. O'Leary
Defendant:
Simply Thick, LLC , Thermo Pac, LLC , Ameriqual Group, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Burgess v. Simply Thick, LLC et al
as 1:2013cv01016
Plaintiff:
Jack Burgess
Defendant:
Simply Thick, LLC , Ameriqual Group, LLC , Respiratory Instruments, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Robinson v. Inova Health Care Services et al
as 1:2011cv00530
Plaintiff:
Barbara Robinson
Defendant:
Inova Health Care Services, Mt. Vernon Internal Medicine, P.C., Valerie Chrosniak and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Gainor v. Health Care Service Group
as 4:2007cv00134
Plaintiff:
Gladys Gainor
Defendant:
Health Care Service Group
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
