Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Medrano Reyes v. McKeone et al.
as 1:2022cv02384
Plaintiff:
Edith Aracely Medrano Reyes
Defendant:
Todd McKeone and Johnston Construction Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Medrano-Gonzalez v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2017cv02721
Plaintiff:
Raquel Medrano-Gonzalez
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Medrano v. Boston Scientific Corporation et al
as 2:2014cv16847
Plaintiff:
Linda Ann Medrano
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation, American Medical Systems, Inc. , C. R. Bard, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Medrano v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv10003
Plaintiff:
Valerie Medrano
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Medrano v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv00483
Plaintiff:
Maria Medrano
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Medrano v. Daniels et al
as 1:2014cv00004
Plaintiff:
Jacqueline Cepeda Medrano
Defendant:
Dwight O. Daniels and Progressive Advanced Insurance Co.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Medrano v. C. R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv30660
Plaintiff:
Natalie Medrano
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc. and Tissue Science Laboratories Limited
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Segovia et al v. American Medical Systems, Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv18278
Plaintiff:
Ana Segovia and Mario Medrano
Defendant:
American Medical Systems, Inc., Ethicon, Inc., Ethicon, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Medrano v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv16752
Plaintiff:
Gail Medrano
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc., Ethicon, LLC and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Medrano v. C. R. Bard, Inc.
as 2:2013cv01525
Plaintiff:
Koleta Medrano
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
