Cases 11 - 20 of 41
Tigress McDaniel v. VTT Management Inc.
as 17-1841
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TIGRESS SYDNEY ACUTE MCDANIEL, as lawful guardian ad litem of Minor Child A.M.
Defendant - Appellee:
VTT MANAGEMENT INC., VTT CHARLOTTE LLC, DEBBIE HICKS and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 16-1196
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Xavier Worthington v. Rose Palmer
as 15-2595
Plaintiff - Appellant:
XAVIER WORTHINGTON
Defendant - Appellee:
ROSE PALMER, Esquire, Court-Appointed Guardian and Conservator for Clyde H. Segear [Deceased] and Alice B. Segear, BON SECOURS, ST. MARY'S HOSPITAL, CASTLE REAL ESTATE, INC. and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 15-2035
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
William Davis, Jr. v. Richard Crouthermel
as 15-2027
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLIAM SCOTT DAVIS, II, next best friend of J.F.D., a Minor Child
Defendant - Appellee:
RICHARD CROUTHERMEL, individually, and in His official capacities as Wake County Attorney Advocate representing Wake County North Carolina Guardian Ad Litem Program
William Davis, Jr. v. Susan Vick
as 15-2021
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLIAM SCOTT DAVIS, II, next best friend of J.F.D., a Minor Child
Defendant - Appellee:
SUSAN VICK, Attorney Advocate for the Wake County Guardian Ad Litem program Individually and in her official capacities and CHARLOTTE MITCHELL, Guardian Ad Litem Individually and in her official Capacities
William Davis, Jr. v. State of North Carolina
as 15-2031
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLIAM SCOTT DAVIS, II
Defendant - Appellee:
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, Governor Bev Perdue, Office of the Governor, WAKE COUNTY GUARDIAN AD LITEM PROGRAM, WAKE COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES and others
William Davis v. Charlotte Mitchel
as 15-1972
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLIAM SCOTT DAVIS, II, as next best friend to his daughter J.F.D., a minor
Plaintiff:
J.F.D., a minor
Defendant - Appellee:
CHARLOTTE MITCHEL, individually and as Guardian Ad Litem of J.F.D., appointed by the Court, WENDY KIRWAN, individually and as Supervisor Wake County N.C. Guardian Ad Litem Program, NAOMIE LIVINGSTON, Individually and as Director Wake County NC Guardian Ad Litem Program and all staff individually and in their official capacities as program managers, superiors and Advocate Attorneys for the Wake County NC 10th Judicial District Guardi and others
Ellen Gerber v. Thom Tilli
as 14-2279
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ELLEN W. GERBER, PEARL BERLIN, LYN MCCOY and others
Defendant:
JEFF THIGPIN, in his official capacity as the Register of Deeds for Guilford County, JOHN W. SMITH, in his official capacity as the Director of the North Carolina Administrative Office of the Courts, DONNA HICKS SPENCER, in her official capacity as the Register of Deeds for Catawba County and others
Intervenor:
ROY COOPER, appearing in a Representative capacity on behalf of State of North Carolina
Intervenor/Defendant - Appellee:
THOM TILLIS, North Carolina Speaker of the House of Representatives and PHIL BERGER, President Pro Tempore of the North Carolina Senate
Marcie Fisher-Borne v. Thom Tilli
as 14-2278
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARCIE FISHER-BORNE, for herself and as guardian ad litem for M.F.-B., a minor, CHANTELLE FISHER-BORNE, for herself and as guardian ad litem for E.F.-B., a minor, TERRI BECK and others
Defendant:
JOHN W. SMITH, in his official capacity as the Director of the North Carolina Administrative Office of the Courts, THE HONORABLE DAVID L. CHURCHILL, in his official capacity as Clerk of the Superior Court for Guilford County, THE HONORABLE ARCHIE L. SMITH, in his official capacity as Clerk of the Superior Court for Durham County and others
Intervenor:
ROY COOPER, appearing in a Representative capacity on behalf of State of North Carolina
Intervenor/Defendant - Appellee:
THOM TILLIS, Speaker of the North Carolina House of Representatives and PHIL BERGER, President Pro Tempore of the North Carolina Senate
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
