Cases 31 - 40 of 168
Shipley v. Disney, Jr. et al
as 1:2021cv03173
Plaintiff:
Clarence Shipley
Defendant:
Deems Martin Disney, Jr., Robert John Bowman, Christopher Bieling and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Pope v. Fletcher-Hill, et al.
as 1:2021cv02935
Plaintiff:
Ms. Mayner J. Pope
Defendant:
The Honorable Lawrence P. Fletcher-Hill, Ms Marilyn F. Bentley, Ms Abigale and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1985
P. et al v. McKnight et al
as 8:2021cv02427
Plaintiff:
W. P., B. K., P. J. and others
Defendant:
MONIFA MCKNIGHT, MONTGOMERY COUTY BOARD OF EDUCATION and Montgomery County Board of Education
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1400
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2021cv02171
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 a
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv02345
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Cofield v. Walgreens Co. et al
as 1:2021cv01187
Plaintiff:
Keenan Kester Cofield and Dr. Keenan Cofield
Defendant:
AutoNation Enterprises Incorporated, Jamie Dimon, Bill Ayares Chevrolet, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv00440
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Evans v. Maryland Department of Labor et al
as 1:2021cv00209
Defendant:
Maryland Department of Labor and Tiffany P. Robinson
Plaintiff:
Tiayon Kadell Evans
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Lancaster v. Smith et al
as 8:2020cv03201
Defendant:
Charles County, Maryland and Haven Smith
Plaintiff:
James P. Lancaster and Haven Smith, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Adams v. Mark Elrich Montgomery County Maryland et al
as 8:2020cv02366
Defendant:
Patricia Lisehora Kane, Richard DeMocker, Jill Reid Cummins and others
Plaintiff:
Kevin Christopher Adams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
