Cases 41 - 50 of 10,938
Lankford v. McCombs et al
as 4:2024cv00084
Plaintiff:
Derek Lankford
Defendant:
Officer McCombs, Sergeant Doe and Newport News Jail Magistrate Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Right Denial of Due Process
Lankford v. Schraudt et al
as 4:2024cv00085
Plaintiff:
Derek Lankford
Defendant:
Jennifer Schraudt and Newport News Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Right Denial of Due Process
Raynor v. The United States et al
as 2:2024cv00367
Plaintiff:
Ryan J. Raynor
Defendant:
The United States and The United States of America
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Bivens Non-Prisoner
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00967
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00421
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Disability Act)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00980
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Konick, Trustee v. Board of Supervisors of Rappahannock County
as 3:2024cv00043
Plaintiff:
David L. Konick, Trustee
Defendant:
Board of Supervisors of Rappahannock County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Respess et al v. VMI Alumni Association
as 6:2024cv00028
Plaintiff:
William L. Respess, Dean Barr, Hugh P. Brien and others
Defendant:
VMI Alumni Association
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00963
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00416
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
