Cases 81 - 90 of 755
Wolfe v. Fairfax County et al
as 1:2022cv00959
Plaintiff:
John Michael Wolfe
Defendant:
Fairfax County, Shulan Jiang, Marline S. Khalil and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Van Utrecht v. United States of America
as 4:2022cv00085
Plaintiff:
John R. Van Utrecht
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Mayhew v. Harris et al
as 3:2022cv00565
Plaintiff:
Cody S Mayhew
Defendant:
Roger L. Harris, John Kcraget and Steve A. Noakes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation (Excess Force)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00043
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00229
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1681 Civil Rights Education Amendments Act 1972
Smith v. Twin County Regional Healthcare et al
as 7:2022cv00238
Plaintiff:
Joshua Lee Smith
Defendant:
Twin County Regional Healthcare, Four Unnamed Doctors and Nurses of Twin County Regional Healthcare, Karl R. Hade and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Dillard v. The City of Lynchburg et al
as 6:2022cv00031
Plaintiff:
Devann Dillard
Defendant:
The City of Lynchburg, Jarrod Cox, Elijah Phelps and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Paschal v. Van Hollen et al
as 3:2022cv00479
Plaintiff:
Anthony Diante Paschal
Defendant:
Chris Van Hollen, Cindy Hyde-Smith, Christopher Coons and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jarrett v. Does 1-25 et al
as 2:2022cv00012
Plaintiff:
Tonee N. Jarrett
Defendant:
Jane Does 1-25, John Does 1-25 and Rodney Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Williams v. Berger et al
as 3:2022cv00433
Plaintiff:
Clothilda Williams
Defendant:
Officer Berger, Sergeant English, Office Jennings and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
