Cases 1 - 10 of 22
Curry v. South Carolina, State of
as 3:2023cv05525
Plaintiff:
Jerome Curry and Flesh And Bloodman
Defendant:
South Carolina, State of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Kimner v. Currie et al
as 3:2023cv04212
Plaintiff:
Audrey L. Kimner
Defendant:
Cameron McGowan Currie and Shiva V. Hodges
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Boggs v. Boroughs et al
as 3:2023cv00458
Plaintiff:
Richard Boggs
Defendant:
US Attny. Adair F. Boroughs, IRS Special Agent Donald "Trey" Eakins, IRS Special Agent Peter Rae and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Curry-Cobbs et al v. Richland County Sheriff's Department et al
as 3:2022cv04394
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Curry-Cobbs and Ryan Alderson, Esq.
Defendant:
Richland County Sheriff's Department, Richland County, Shane Kitchen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00911
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Grant et al v. South Carolina Department of Social Services et al
as 2:2018cv01804
Defendant:
Sasserie Miles, Adrea Reynolds, South Carolina Department of Social Services and others
Plaintiff:
Raymond Michael Grant, III and Tiana Elizabeth Grant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. McMaster et al
as 8:2017cv02549
Plaintiff:
Samuel N. Smith
Defendant:
Henry McMaster, Jean Toal, Rick Quinn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. McMaster et al
as 3:2015cv02177
Plaintiff:
Samuel N Smith
Defendant:
Henry D McMaster, Jean H Toal, Rick Quinn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Murray v. Currie
as 3:2015cv01087
Plaintiff:
Isaac Murray
Defendant:
Judge Currie
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bridlewood Development LLC v. Litz et al
as 2:2014cv03721
Plaintiff:
Bridlewood Development LLC
Defendant:
John T Litz and Steven J Currie
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
