Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Ellis v. Boyer et al
as 1:2023cv01980
Plaintiff:
Amber T. Ellis
Defendant:
Mark Kenneth Boyer, Milton Kenneth Long, Jr., Viki M. Pauler and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Bonaparte v. Harrison et al
as 1:2020cv01343
Plaintiff:
Andre Bonaparte
Defendant:
Michael S. Harrison, James Gillis, Eric(k) Leach and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2017cv00180
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2016cv03962
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
J.F and D.F. Minors et al v. Correct Care Solutions, LLC et al
as 8:2016cv02177
Plaintiff:
J.F and D.F. Minors , Brittany Fleshman , Deborah Ann Benton and others
Defendant:
Correct Care Solutions, LLC, Conmed Health Care Management, Inc., Vabian Lewitt Paden, M.D. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hairfield-Ulsch v. Montgomery County Police Department et al.
as 8:2014cv02418
Plaintiff:
Charles Tyler Hairfield-Ulsch
Defendant:
Montgomery County Police Department , Officer Patrick Skiba , Officer Farmer and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Fether et al v. State of Maryland et al
as 1:2013cv01083
Plaintiff:
Nancy Fether and Francis Lihvarchik
Defendant:
State of Maryland , Jeffrey Hyatt , Anthony Lorusso and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Baltimore City Entertainment Group, LP v. The Maryland Video Lottery Facility Location Commission et al
as 1:2011cv01848
Plaintiff:
Baltimore City Entertainment Group, LP
Defendant:
The Maryland Video Lottery Facility Location Commission, Donald C. Fry, Thomas P. Barbera and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv01370
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
