Cases 11 - 20 of 177
Gregory v. Koon et al
as 5:2022cv02743
Plaintiff:
Jeremiah Martin Gregory
Defendant:
Jay Koon, Mr Singleton, Captain Currancri and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Jenkins v. USA
as 2:2022cv01492
Petitioner:
Devante Rashard Jenkins
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Vanzant v. Cohen et al
as 6:2021cv04006
Plaintiff:
Ronnie J Vanzant
Defendant:
Lavern Cohen, Aubray Baily, Tracy Mitchell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hall v. Southern Health Partners, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv01251
Defendant:
Jarret Logan, Aaron Christopher Welsh, Tywanna Jenkins and others
Plaintiff:
Billy Ray Hall
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Jenkins v. Stirling et al
as 8:2021cv01107
Defendant:
Sam Ray, Uniqueqa James, Michael McCall and others
Plaintiff:
Joseph Jenkins and Deloris Jenkins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jenkins v. Estill (FCI) Food Service Administrator
as 1:2021cv00557
Defendant:
Estill (FCI) Food Service Administrator, Cook Supervisor and Food Service Administrator
Plaintiff:
Steve Jenkins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jenkins v. United States of America et al
as 9:2021cv00392
Plaintiff:
Travis LaVoy Jenkins
Defendant:
Naphcare Insurance, Dismas Charities, Inc., United States of America and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Jenkins v. State of South Carolina
as 4:2021cv00374
Respondent:
State of South Carolina
Petitioner:
Leonard Eugene Jenkins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Jenkins v. Thomas et al
as 2:2021cv00109
Defendant:
Nurse Geri Gillespie, Captain Michael Rasar and Lieutenant Tahirah Thomas
Plaintiff:
Rakish Jenkins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jenkins v. Thomas et al
as 9:2021cv00109
Defendant:
Nurse Geri Gillespie, Captain Michael Rasar and Lieutenant Tahirah Thomas
Plaintiff:
Rakish Jenkins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
