Cases 11 - 20 of 25
Al-Wahhab v. Commonwealth of Virginia et al
as 3:2018cv00318
Petitioner:
Yusuf Abdul Al-Wahhab
Respondent:
Virginia Commonwealth of, Corrections Department of and Green Rock Correctional Center
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Allison v. Warden of Green Rock Correctional Center et al
as 2:2015cv00273
Petitioner:
John Allison
Respondent:
Warden of the Green Rock Correctional Center and Attorney General Of The State Of Virginia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Rock v. Wilson
as 1:2014cv00653
Petitioner:
Tyrell Rock
Respondent:
Eric D. Wilson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Stevenson v. Warden of Green Rock Correctional Center
as 1:2014cv00494
Petitioner:
Mushaune X. Stevenson
Respondent:
Warden of Green Rock Correctional Center
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Headen v. Warden of Green Rock Correctional Center
as 7:2013cv00005
Plaintiff:
Ronnie Headen
Defendant:
Warden of Green Rock Correctional Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Willoughby v. Rock
as 1:2012cv00777
Plaintiff:
Mike Willoughby
Defendant:
Dustin C. Rock
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Wang et al
as 7:2011cv00002
Defendant:
J. Brumfield, V. Bryon, Jeffrey N. Dillman and others
Plaintiff:
Johnathan Lee X Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hill v. Federal Bureau Of Prisons et al
as 2:2009cv00206
Plaintiff:
Daniel Hill
Defendant:
Federal Bureau Of Prisons, Patricia Stansberry, Barglof and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Dillman et al
as 7:2009cv00097
Plaintiff:
Johnathan Lee Smith
Defendant:
Jeffrey Dillman, C. Mayes, Laurence Wang and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Mitchell v. The Warden of Green Rock Correctional Center
as 1:2009cv00032
Petitioner:
Ramon Mitchell
Respondent:
The Warden of Green Rock Correctional Center
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
