Cases 21 - 30 of 683
Francis v. Mullens et al
as 7:2024cv00387
Defendant:
Jane Doe or John Doe, Hospital/Western Virginia Regional Emergency Physicians, LLc and Doctor Mullens
Plaintiff:
Cecil D. Francis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stone v. Unknown
as 3:2024cv00428
Defendant:
John Doe #1, John Doe #4, John Doe #2 and others
Plaintiff:
Allen Eugene Stone
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Vaughter v. Vaughn et al
as 2:2024cv00377
Defendant:
Dr. M. Clarke, Gary Jones, Lt. Adlan and others
Plaintiff:
James R. Vaughter
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Newton v. G.E.O Group, Inc et al
as 3:2024cv00413
Defendant:
G.E.O Group, Inc, C. O. Mason, John Doe and others
Plaintiff:
Earl Nicholas Newton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wysinger v. Bryson et al
as 7:2024cv00350
Defendant:
Mr. S. Bryson and Warden Mr. John Doe
Plaintiff:
Kendall D. Wysinger
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Wayne v. Hawes et al
as 7:2024cv00325
Defendant:
John Doe #2, John Doe #1, Spencer Hawes and others
Plaintiff:
Robert James Wayne
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rufus v. Vasquez et al
as 1:2024cv00825
Defendant:
Vasquez, Thompson, McWilliams and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Rufus
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Banks v. Owens et al
as 7:2024cv00303
Plaintiff:
Angelo Banks
Defendant:
Officer Owens, Officer Thornberry, Officer Fuller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Edwards v. Mathena et al
as 7:2024cv00296
Plaintiff:
Michael Derrick Edwards
Defendant:
Randall C. Mathena, Lois Fegan, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Watson v. Hamilton et al
as 7:2024cv00298
Plaintiff:
Kevin A. Watson
Defendant:
M. Hamilton, K.D. Ramey, Mr. White and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
