Cases 21 - 30 of 32
Footman v. Banks et al
as 5:2016cv01840
Plaintiff:
Ron Christopher Footman
Defendant:
Martin R Banks and Karen Fryar
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rochester v. Georgia pacific Paper Corp et al
as 6:2015cv02220
Plaintiff:
Julian E Rochester
Defendant:
Georgia pacific Paper Corp, Marlboro Regl Trumer Hosp, Paper-Mate Pen Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Footman v. South Carolina, State of et al
as 5:2013cv02320
Plaintiff:
Ron Christopher Footman
Defendant:
South Carolina, State of, Martin R Banks and Karen Fryer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rochester v. Fed Reserve Ins et al
as 6:2013cv01061
Plaintiff:
Julian E Rochester
Defendant:
Fed Reserve Ins, South Carolina National Bank and Any Unknown Defendants
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Banks v. South Carolina, State of et al
as 9:2010cv00785
Plaintiff:
Charles Arthur Banks
Defendant:
South Carolina, State of, Family Court, Pamela S Mullins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Lance v. Carolina First Bank et al
as 9:2009cv02649
Plaintiff:
Jesse R Lance
Defendant:
Carolina First Bank, Nan D Leviner, Georgetown, City of and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Murrah v. Rivera
as 9:2008cv03712
Petitioner:
Joseph Banks Murrah
Respondent:
M Rivera
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Riches v. First Data Bank Inc et al
as 6:2008cv01304
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Lee Riches
Defendant:
First Data Bank Inc and Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Riches v. Banks et al
as 6:2008cv00915
Petitioner:
Jonathan Lee Riches
Respondent:
Frederick Hamilton Banks and FCI Williamsburg
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Penland v. Carolina First Bank et al
as 6:2007cv03109
Plaintiff:
Charles W Penland, Sr
Defendant:
Carolina First Bank, United States of America and Bonding Company issuing bond
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
