Cases 21 - 30 of 34
BAILEY v. GARDNER et al
as 1:2017cv00144
Plaintiff:
ROBERT GENE BAILEY
Defendant:
JOSEPH GARDNER, C. C. BLAKE, WILLIAM C. TOMAN, JR. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BAILEY v. GARDNER et al
as 1:2016cv01408
Plaintiff:
ROBERT GENE BAILEY
Defendant:
JOSEPH GARDNER, WILLIAM C. TOMAN, JR., K. D. MACKEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BAILEY v. GARDNER et al
as 1:2016cv01129
Plaintiff:
ROBERT GENE BAILEY
Defendant:
JOSEPH GARDNER, WILLIAM C. TOMAN, JR., K. D. MACKEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BAILEY v. GARDNER et al
as 1:2016cv01064
Plaintiff:
ROBERT GENE BAILEY
Defendant:
JOSEPH GARDNER, WILLIAM C. TOMAN, JR., C.C. BLAKE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BAILEY v. CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE, N.C. et al
as 1:2016cv00341
Plaintiff:
ROBERT GENE BAILEY
Defendant:
CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE, N.C., ZONING AND INSPECTIONS and M. WILSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BAILEY v. PARSEK et al
as 1:2016cv00348
Plaintiff:
ROBERT GENE BAILEY
Defendant:
JOHN PARSEK, MARION WILSON, CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE N.C. ZONING DEPARTMENT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BAILEY v. GARDNER et al
as 1:2016cv00334
Plaintiff:
ROBERT GENE BAILEY
Defendant:
JOSEPH GARDNER, RON SMITH, K. D. MACKEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BAILEY v. GARDNER et al
as 1:2016cv00321
Plaintiff:
ROBERT GENE BAILEY
Defendant:
JOSEPH GARDNER, WILLIAM C. TOMAN, JR., R. M. ASHLEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BAILEY v. CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE NORTH CAROLINA et al
as 1:2016cv00271
Plaintiff:
ROBERT GENE BAILEY
Defendant:
CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE NORTH CAROLINA, WILLIAM TOMIN, JR., K.D. MORLEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harding v. Cumberland County Municipality et al
as 5:2016ct03005
Plaintiff:
Sylvester E. Harding, III
Defendant:
Cumberland County Municipality, City of Fayetteville, Fayetteville Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
