Cases 31 - 40 of 40
Littlejohn v. Blanton et al
as 6:2008cv00242
Plaintiff:
Quintin M Littlejohn
Defendant:
Bill Blanton, Harold Crocker, Kenny Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr (Other)
Littlejohn v. Ferlauto
as 6:2007cv03651
Plaintiff:
Quintin M Littlejohn
Defendant:
Michael Ferlauto
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Littlejohn v. State of South Carolina et al
as 6:2007cv03560
Petitioner:
Quintin M Littlejohn
Respondent:
State of South Carolina, Director and Director
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (County)
Littlejohn v. Blanton et al
as 6:2007cv03157
Plaintiff:
Quintin M Littlejohn
Defendant:
Bill Blanton, Cherokee County Detention Center and NFN Burgess
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Littlejohn v. Creciven
as 6:2007cv02177
Petitioner:
Quintin M Littlejohn
Respondent:
Harold Creciven
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Littlejohn v. Patrick B Harris Psychiatric Hospital
as 6:2007cv00903
Plaintiff:
Quintin M Littlejohn
Defendant:
Patrick B Harris Psychiatric Hospital
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Littlejohn v. Crocker
as 6:2007cv00221
Petitioner:
Quintin M Littlejohn
Respondent:
Harold Crocker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Littlejohn v. Parker et al
as 6:2007cv00075
Plaintiff:
Quintin M Littlejohn
Defendant:
NFN Parker and Unknown Inmate
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Littlejohn v. Littlejohn
as 6:2007cv00007
Plaintiff:
Quintin M Littlejohn
Defendant:
Mary Elnora Morning Littlejohn
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Littlejohn v. Thomas
as 6:2007cv00006
Plaintiff:
Quintin M Littlejohn
Defendant:
R Thomas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
