Cases 31 - 40 of 55
Titus Thomas v. G. L. Wilson
as 11-6599
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TITUS THOMAS
Defendant - Appellee:
G. WILSON, D. KRAMPT, R. C. ALLISON and others
Party-in-Interest:
OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL
Titus Thomas v. Officer G. L. Wilson
as 11-6121
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TITUS THOMAS
Defendant - Appellee:
G. WILSON, D. KRAMPT, R. C. ALLISON and others
Party-in-Interest:
OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL
David Williams v. R. Mathena
as 10-7686
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID W. WILLIAMS
Defendant - Appellee:
R. C. MATHENA, Warden, J. KISER, Assistant Warden, MR. BAKER, Psychologist and others
Williams v. Mathena et al
as 7:2010cv00404
Defendant:
Mr. Baker, Central Classification; Name Unknown, Mr. Former and others
Plaintiff:
David W. Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Zachary Cooper, Sr. v. J. Dooley
as 10-7226
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ZACHARY COOPER, SR.
Defendant - Appellee:
J. DOOLEY, Counselor, CORDLE, Counselor, D. VASS, Treatment Program Supervisor and others
Cooper v. Dooley et al
as 7:2010cv00290
Plaintiff:
Zachary Cooper, Sr.
Defendant:
Cordle, J. Dooley, J. Garman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Clayton Brown v. R. Mathena
as 10-6772
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CLAYTON BROWN
Defendant - Appellee:
R. C. MATHENA, Warden, OFFICER MITCHELL and SERGEANT SHRIEVE
Brown v. Mathena et al
as 7:2010cv00192
Plaintiff:
Clayton Brown
Defendant:
Warden R. C. Mathena, Officer Mitchell and Sgt. Shrieve
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Michael Rankins v. Donnie Stanley
as 10-6211
Appellant:
MICHAEL RANKINS
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH JOHN URBANIAK, JR., EDWARD ALLEN, SHAWN DERRICK BONNETT and others
Defendant - Appellee:
DONNIE STANLEY, Sgt., JOHN MEEKS, Capt., THOMAS TART, Lt. and others
William Jones, Jr. v. R. Mathena
as 10-6087
Petitioner - Appellant:
WILLIAM T. JONES, JR.
Respondent - Appellee:
R. C. MATHENA, Mr.; Warden; Keen Mountain Corr. Ctr.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
