Cases 31 - 40 of 108
Fields v. Robinson et al
as 3:2015cv00455
Plaintiff:
Phillip W. Fields
Defendant:
David Robinson, Harold Clarke, Gregory Holloway and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Eric DePaola v. VDOC
as 15-7010
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ERIC JOSEPH DEPAOLA
Defendant - Appellee:
VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, HAROLD CLARKE, W. P. ROGERS and others
Jones v. Fink et al
as 3:2015cv00251
Plaintiff:
Mariah Jones
Defendant:
Fink, Cambell and Tracy Ray
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rivera v. Clark et al
as 2:2015cv00143
Petitioner:
Kevin P. Rivera
Respondent:
Harold W. Clark, Tracy Ray, James Parks and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Tony Foster v. Tracy S. Ray
as 15-6482
Petitioner - Appellant:
TONY FOSTER
Respondent - Appellee:
TRACY RAY
Cole v. Holloway et al
as 1:2015cv00413
Plaintiff:
Nathan Cole
Defendant:
Gregory L. Holloway, C. W. Carpino, B. D. Schuyler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Carl Gordon v. Rena Mullin
as 14-6497
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CARL D. GORDON
Defendant - Appellee:
RENA I. MULLINS, Institutional Ombudsman, FONNIE TAYLOR, Institutional Ombudsman, SHERRY SHORTRIDGE, Institutional Operations Officer/Manager and others
Defendant:
W. P. ROGERS, Assistant Deputy Director of Operations of the VDOC, JOHN JABE, JOHN S. GARMAN, Regional Director for the Western Region of the VDOC and others
Grethen v. Clarke et al
as 2:2013cv00416
Plaintiff:
Mark A. Grethen
Defendant:
Harold W. Clarke, Gene M. Johnson, John Jabe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Levi Springer v. Randall Mathena
as 13-7198
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LEVI SPRINGER
Defendant - Appellee:
RANDALL MATHENA, TERESA PEASE, J. EDNEY and others
Defendant:
LIEUTENANT MCCOWAN and TRACY RAY
Levi Springer v. Randall Mathena
as 13-6214
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LEVI SPRINGER
Defendant - Appellee:
RANDALL MATHENA, TERESA PEASE, J. EDNEY and others
Defendant:
LIEUTENANT MCCOWAN and TRACY RAY
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
