Cases 31 - 40 of 167
Allen v. Tunecore et al
as 1:2023cv00999
Plaintiff:
Marcus M. Allen
Defendant:
Tunecore, Dennis Ladegaillerie, Distro Kid and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Woods v. Weber
as 1:2023cv00900
Petitioner:
Robert D. Woods
Respondent:
Ronald S. Weber
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ronald Cox v. Ronald Weber
as 23-6148
Petitioner:
RONALD COX
Respondent:
WARDEN RONALD S. WEBER and ATTORNEY GENERAL ANTHONY G. BROWN
Wood v. Weber et al
as 1:2023cv00125
Defendant:
Yes Care, Warden R. Shane Weber, Asst. Warden Bradley O. Buttler and others
Plaintiff:
Shelton Lamont Wood
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Miguel Angel Rivera v. Wayne Hill
as 23-6065
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MIGUEL A. RIVERA-ALVAREZ
Defendant / Appellee:
DIRECTOR WAYNE O. HILL, WARDEN AT J.C.I. ALLEN GANG, SERGEANT AT J.C.I. MR. LEE and others
Ronald Cox v. Ronald Weber
as 23-6044
Petitioner / Appellant:
RONALD COX
Respondent / Appellee:
WARDEN ALLEN GANG, MARYLAND ATTORNEY GENERAL, WARDEN RONALD S. WEBER and others
Jones v. Weber et al
as 1:2023cv00059
Plaintiff:
Joshua Colonna Jones
Defendant:
Warden Ronald Shane Weber, Librarian Liam Kennedy and A.R.P. Coordinator Alicia Cartwright
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Andrew Dicks v. Ronald Weber
as 22-7311
Petitioner / Appellant:
ANDREW JOSEPH DICKS
Respondent / Appellee:
RONALD S. WEBER
Jones v. Ronald Shane Weber et al
as 1:2022cv02707
Plaintiff:
Joshua Colonna Jones
Defendant:
Ronald Shane Weber and Medical Department of WCI
Interested Party:
Division of Correction
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Woody v. Maryland Attorney General
as 1:2022cv02308
Petitioner:
Paul Willard Woody
Respondent:
Maryland Attorney General
Defendant:
Ronald S. Weber
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
