Cases 41 - 50 of 71
Shivar v. Polk
as 5:2007hc02111
Petitioner:
Donald Ray Shivar
Respondent:
M. L. Polk
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Thaggard v. Polk
as 5:2007hc02104
Petitioner:
James Thaggard
Respondent:
Marvin L. Polk
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Tucker v. United States of America et al
as 5:2007hc02095
Petitioner:
Cornelius Tucker, Jr.
Respondent:
United States of America, District of Columbia, M. L. Polk and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Simmons v. Thompson et al
as 5:2007ct03071
Plaintiff:
Charlie Simmons
Defendant:
Nurse Thompson, Joseph Lightsey, Obe Umeci and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Steele v. Simmons et al
as 5:2007ct03068
Plaintiff:
Trevon Steele
Defendant:
Z. Simmons, Joseph Lightsey, Guard Bosworth and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tucker v. Polk et al
as 5:2007hc02089
Petitioner:
Cornelius Tucker
Respondent:
Marvin L. Polk and State of North Carolina
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Steele v. Carr et al
as 5:2007ct03061
Plaintiff:
Trevon Steele
Defendant:
Sgt. Carr, R. Wellman, McCullough and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Polk v. Beeler et al
as 5:2007ct03058
Plaintiff:
Kevin Sean Polk
Defendant:
A. F. Beeler and Alberto Gonzales
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Ford v. Polk
as 5:2007hc02070
Petitioner:
Harris Emanuel Ford
Respondent:
Marvin L. Polk
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Steele v. Correll et al
as 5:2007ct03051
Plaintiff:
Trevon Steele
Defendant:
Sgt. Correll, Sgt. Carr, Simmons and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
