Cases 41 - 50 of 25,013
Baird v. Sharp et al
as 0:2024cv03549
Plaintiff:
Dewight Sheldon Baird
Defendant:
Warden Kenneth Sharp, Sergeant T. Session and John Doe 1-10
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr (Other)
Brooks v. Jackson
as 1:2024cv03511
Petitioner:
Emonte Brooks
Respondent:
Shane Jackson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Campos v. Jackson
as 8:2024cv03510
Petitioner:
Filiberto Campos
Respondent:
Warden Shane Jackson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Donovan v. Stirling et al
as 8:2024cv03512
Plaintiff:
Michael Patrick Donovan
Defendant:
Bryan P. Stirling, Major FNU Gregg, A W Fredricks and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Gaillard v. Hill-Finklea Detention Center et al
as 2:2024cv03496
Plaintiff:
Percy Devon Gaillard
Defendant:
Hill-Finklea Detention Center, Major Anthony Fyall, Cpt. Archie Beau and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
McClellan v. Stirling
as 9:2024cv03458
Plaintiff:
James Anderson McClellan
Defendant:
Brian Stirling
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Tabata v. City of Hanahan et al
as 2:2024cv03448
Plaintiff:
Luxolo Tabata
Defendant:
City of Hanahan, Mildred Rowell and Private First Class Goss
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Breach of Contract- Insurance
Wright v. South Carolina, State of
as 1:2024cv03441
Petitioner:
Robert Lee Wright
Respondent:
South Carolina, State of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Fuller v. Spartanburg County et al
as 6:2024cv03449
Plaintiff:
Deandre L Fuller
Defendant:
Spartanburg County and Sheriff Chuck Wright
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (County)
Brownfield v. Brownfield
as 9:2024cv03432
Petitioner:
O'Livia C. Brownfield
Respondent:
Brandon C. Brownfield
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
