Cases 41 - 50 of 24,949
Graves v. White et al
as 1:2024cv03233
Plaintiff:
Michael David Graves, Jr.
Defendant:
Cathy White, Shanna Peeler, Officer Adams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Brown v. Sheriff Al Cannon Detention Center et al
as 4:2024cv03238
Plaintiff:
Dominick Alexander Brown
Defendant:
Sheriff Al Cannon Detention Center, Charleston County Sheriff's Office, Sgt. Y. Gladden and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Bogan v. Warden FCI Edgefield
as 5:2024cv01624
Petitioner:
Clarence Bogan
Respondent:
Warden FCI Edgefield
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Brogdon v. Graham
as 5:2024cv01706
Petitioner:
Conell Brogdon
Respondent:
Warden Graham
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Roberts, Jr. v. State of South Carolina
as 2:2024cv01720
Plaintiff:
Emory W. Roberts, Jr.
Defendant:
State of South Carolina
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Alston v. Hamilton et al
as 0:2024cv03210
Plaintiff:
Londell Lashun Alston and Londell Alston
Defendant:
Marina Bender Hamilton and Rickey P. Sanders
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr (Other)
Butler et al v. Platt et al
as 5:2024cv03187
Plaintiff:
Phillip Mitchell Butler and Charles Gene Butler
Defendant:
Sergeant Katlyn M. Platt and Jerome Felder
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr (Other)
Butler et al v. Dash
as 5:2024cv03188
Plaintiff:
Phillip Mitchell Butler and Charles Gene Butler
Defendant:
Judge Derrick F. Dash
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr (Other)
Alston v. Hicks
as 0:2024cv03209
Petitioner:
Londell Lashun Alston
Respondent:
Chief John Hicks
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (County)
Hosley v. Jansen
as 1:2024cv01621
Petitioner:
Otis Hosley
Respondent:
Warden Jansen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
