Cases 51 - 60 of 266
Arroyo v. Vergakis et al
as 2:2022cv00478
Plaintiff:
Amos Arroyo
Defendant:
John Vergakis, Jane Murphy, John or Jane Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Godfrey v. Davis et al
as 7:2022cv00607
Plaintiff:
Rodetrick Lamont Godfrey
Defendant:
Corey Davis, Jane Doe, Albert Vanderpool and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Josiah-El-Bey v. Davis et al
as 7:2022cv00597
Plaintiff:
Delroy Josiah-El-Bey
Defendant:
Delroy Josiah, Carl A. Manis, Melvin C. Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Anderson v. Clarke et al
as 2:2022cv00355
Plaintiff:
John David Anderson, III
Defendant:
Harold W. Clarke, Leslie J. Fleming, Beth E. Cabell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Reed v. Rosch et al
as 7:2022cv00457
Plaintiff:
Winston NaJee Reed
Defendant:
Kyle Rosch, Harold Clarke, Warden Jeffery Kiezer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Burnette v. Miller et al
as 7:2022cv00417
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Lee Burnette
Defendant:
Lt. Miller, Lt. Hall, Major O'Dell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Burrell v. Shirley et al
as 1:2022cv00716
Plaintiff:
Joel Aaron Burrell
Defendant:
D. Shirley, Jane Doe, Scadd and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hawks v. Clark et al
as 7:2022cv00301
Plaintiff:
Ricky Lee Hawks and Rocky Lee Hawks
Defendant:
Harold W. Clark, Gregory P. Winston, John Bowman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gil v. Doe et al
as 1:2022cv00618
Plaintiff:
Patrick Nilo Gil
Defendant:
Jane Doe, Lt. Fowlkes, Sgt. Ward and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Bivens Prisoner
Parks v. Clarke et al
as 3:2022cv00029
Plaintiff:
Dolly Yvonne Parks
Defendant:
Harold W. Clarke, A. David Robinson, Stephen M. Herrick and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
