Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in the Fourth Circuit Courts
Cases 61 - 70 of 95
Sanders v FCI Gilmer
as 1:2016cv00242
Plaintiff: Christopher Sanders
Defendant: FCI Gilmer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Sanders v. FCI Gilmer et al
as 3:2016cv00163
Plaintiff: Christopher Sanders
Defendant: FCI Gilmer, Medical Staff, Psychology Department and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Gutierrez-Jaramillo v. FCI Gilmer We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2016cv00172
Petitioner: Julio Cesar Gutierrez-Jaramillo
Respondent: FCI Gilmer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Suggs v. Warden, FCI Gilmer We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2016cv00058
Petitioner: Ricardo M. Suggs, Jr.
Respondent: Warden, FCI Gilmer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Suggs v. Warden, FCI Gilmer
as 2:2016cv00051
Petitioner: Ricardo M. Suggs, Jr.
Respondent: Warden, FCI Gilmer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Riley v. Williams et al
as 3:2016cv00015
Plaintiff: Tony D. Riley
Defendant: C. Williams, Weaver, M. Anderson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Kevin Lockhart v. C. William
as 16-6167
Petitioner - Appellant: KEVIN B. LOCKHART
Respondent - Appellee: C. WILLIAMS, FCI Gilmer Warden
Bryan Keith Richardson v. Charles William We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 15-7033
Petitioner - Appellant: BRYAN KEITH RICHARDSON
Respondent - Appellee: RUSSELL A. PERDUE, Warden of FCI Gilmer and CHARLES WILLIAMS, Warden FCI Gilmer
Respondent: ASSOCIATE WARDEN FERGUSON, DEBBIE LOHR, DHO hearing officer and LIEUTENANT PRINCE
Brooks v. Warden, FCI Gilmer We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2015cv00044
Petitioner: Marcus L. Brooks
Respondent: Warden, FCI Gilmer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Edwards v. Warden
as 3:2015cv00044
Petitioner: Mark R. Edwards
Respondent: FCI Gilmer Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?