Cases 1 - 10 of 814
Vaughter v. Vaughn et al
as 2:2024cv00377
Plaintiff:
James R. Vaughter
Defendant:
Lt. R. Vaughn, Sgt. Andrews, Ofc. Mobley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Unknown
as 3:2024cv00258
Plaintiff:
Timothy A. Jones
Defendant:
Unknown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Director Department Corrections
as 1:2024cv00976
Petitioner:
Herbert William Jones, Jr.
Respondent:
Director Department Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Meyers v. Rosch et al
as 2:2024cv00348
Plaintiff:
David Meyers
Defendant:
Kyle Rosch, Chadwick Dotson, S. Soloman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mabry v. Hopkins et al
as 3:2024cv00396
Plaintiff:
Jabar Mabry
Defendant:
CO Hopkins and Lt. Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Jones et al
as 7:2024cv00340
Plaintiff:
Marcus Johnson
Defendant:
FNU Jones, FNU Firmburn, FNU Mitchell and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Jones v. Owens
as 7:2024cv00331
Plaintiff:
Jahkeem Wesley Jones
Defendant:
R. Owens
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rivera v. Anderson et al
as 7:2024cv00224
Plaintiff:
Denis Alberto Rivera
Defendant:
David Anderson, Harold W. Clarke, Randall C. Mathena and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Springer v. Virginia Department of Corrections et al
as 7:2024cv00193
Plaintiff:
Levi G. Springer
Defendant:
Virginia Department of Corrections, Chadwick Dotson, Director of Medical Services and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nicholson v. Bureau of Prisons et al
as 2:2024cv00282
Plaintiff:
Leon Nicholson
Defendant:
Bureau of Prisons, Warden Zook, D. Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
