Cases 1 - 10 of 347
Whetsell v. Murnock et al
as 2:2024cv05487
Defendant:
PFC Martinez and Kevin Alexander Murnock
Plaintiff:
Michael Branden Whetsell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ferguson v. Pickens County Detention Center et al
as 6:2024cv03984
Defendant:
Sheriff Tommy Blankenship, Pickens County Detention Center and Lieutenant Kevin Durham
Plaintiff:
Brett William Ferguson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Dextraze v. MacMillan
as 9:2024cv04142
Plaintiff:
Kevin Richard Dextraze
Defendant:
Officer MacMillan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Dextraze v. Horry County Sheriff's Department et al
as 4:2024cv04283
Defendant:
Horrie County Sherrif's Department and Deputy Skinner
Plaintiff:
Kevin Richard Dextraze
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Dextraze v. Mason
as 9:2024cv04136
Plaintiff:
Kevin Richard Dextraze
Defendant:
Officer Mason
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Dextraze v. Floyd
as 9:2024cv04135
Plaintiff:
Kevin Richard Dextraze
Defendant:
Director Jimmy Floyd
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bennett v. Tolson
as 1:2024cv04432
Petitioner:
James E. Bennett
Respondent:
Sheriff Kevin R. Tolson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Coffy, Sr. v. Richards et al
as 2:2024cv04369
Plaintiff:
Marlin Elrico Coffy, Sr.
Defendant:
Michael S. Hannon, Jr., FTO Douglas Richards, Lee Dittrich and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Dextraze v. Cribb et al
as 4:2024cv03407
Defendant:
Deputy Sheriff Scott, Deputy Sheriff White and Deputy Sheriff Cribb
Plaintiff:
Kevin Richard Dextraze
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Dextraze v. Mondules
as 9:2024cv03406
Defendant:
Correctional Officer Mondules
Plaintiff:
Kevin Richard Dextraze
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
