Cases 1 - 10 of 16
McClain v. Baker et al
as 0:2024cv03329
Plaintiff:
Johnny I. McClain, III
Defendant:
Andy Baker, Y.C.D.C. Officer and Mrs. Huffman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr (Other)
McClain v. Hewitt et al
as 0:2024cv03330
Plaintiff:
Johnny I. McClain, III
Defendant:
Sgt. Michael Hewitt, Chief Admin John Hicks, Operations Capt. Rodney Hope and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr (Other)
McClain v. South Carolina Department of Corrections
as 0:2024cv01322
Petitioner:
Johnny I. McClain, III
Respondent:
South Carolina Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Labo v. Cherokee County Detention Center et al
as 0:2024cv00181
Plaintiff:
Bobby Edward Labo
Defendant:
Cherokee County Detention Center, Major Stephen Anderson, Lt Stanford and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Labo v. OFC Riddle et al
as 0:2024cv00130
Plaintiff:
Bobby Edward Labo
Defendant:
OFC Riddle, Lt Stanford, Officer Riddle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Byrd v. Cisco et al
as 8:2023cv01717
Plaintiff:
Ivey Nicole Byrd
Defendant:
Lt Cisco, Sgt Capps, Judge Roper and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
T.R. v. S.C.D.C.
as 0:2020cv01395
Plaintiff:
T.R., et alia and Daniel R. McClain
Defendant:
S.C.D.C
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McClain v. South Carolina, State of
as 0:2018cv03081
Respondent:
South Carolina, State of and Warden
Petitioner:
Daniel R. McClain
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
McClain v. USA
as 8:2016cv02064
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Samuel Olen McClain
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
McClain v. Fate et al
as 0:2015cv04516
Plaintiff:
Daniel R McClain
Defendant:
Lefford Fate, Samuel Soltis, John B Tomarchio and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
