Cases 1 - 10 of 30,631
Wellman v. USA
as 7:2024cv00541
Petitioner:
Corey Wellman
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Hunt v. Global Tel Link Corporation et al
as 5:2024hc02124
Petitioner:
Michael Eugene Hunt
Respondent:
Global Tellink Corporation, ViaPath Technologies and Todd E. Ishee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Bohlman v. Unnamed Respondent
as 5:2024hc02125
Petitioner:
Jeremy Bohlman
Respondent:
Unnamed Respondent
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
TERRY v. USA
as 1:2024cv00530
Petitioner:
GARY IVAN TERRY
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Langley v. State of North Carolina
as 1:2024cv00528
Petitioner:
DARNELL LANGLEY
Respondent:
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
RUTLEDGE v. RUTLEDGE-CHAMBERS et al
as 1:2024cv00520
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER R. RUTLEDGE
Defendant:
SHANNON RUTLEDGE-CHAMBERS, DUKE UNIVERSITY, RHINE RESEARCH CENTER and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Prisoner Bivens Action
Lewis v. Scarantino
as 5:2024hc02123
Petitioner:
Jamal Lewis
Respondent:
Tom Scarantino
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Williams v. Kelly et al
as 5:2024ct03159
Plaintiff:
Anthony D. Williams and Anthony Davis Williams
Defendant:
L.B. Kelly, Ms. Long, John Doe Doctor and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Hall v. USA
as 3:2024cv00594
Petitioner:
Marc Pierre Hall
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Rivers v. Town of Mooresville et al
as 5:2024cv00155
Plaintiff:
Maurice D. Rivers
Defendant:
Town of Mooresville, J.E. Glenn, FNU Goodale and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
