Cases 1 - 10 of 24,938
Livingston v. USA
as 4:2024cv03370
Petitioner:
Janice A Livingston
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Wiggins v. Strom Law Firm et al
as 3:2024cv03363
Plaintiff:
Samuel T. Wiggins
Defendant:
Strom Law Firm, Pete Strom, John Doe 1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Byers v. Hasenau et al
as 5:2024cv03333
Plaintiff:
Ramon D Byers
Defendant:
Jason Hasenau and William Sellars
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr (Other)
Thompson v. The State of South Carolina
as 1:2024cv03331
Plaintiff:
James Henry Thompson, II
Defendant:
The State of South Carolina
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
McClain v. Baker et al
as 0:2024cv03329
Plaintiff:
Johnny I. McClain, III
Defendant:
Andy Baker, Y.C.D.C. Officer and Mrs. Huffman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr (Other)
McClain v. Hewitt et al
as 0:2024cv03330
Plaintiff:
Johnny I. McClain, III
Defendant:
Sgt. Michael Hewitt, Chief Admin John Hicks, Operations Capt. Rodney Hope and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr (Other)
Littles v. Days et al
as 1:2024cv03327
Plaintiff:
Dwight Alonso Littles, Jr.
Defendant:
Allyson Days, Waddell Coe and James Hudson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
McCue v. Graziano, S.A.C.D.C.
as 2:2024cv03332
Petitioner:
Jeffrey Terrell McCue
Respondent:
Chief Graziano, S.A.C.D.C.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (County)
SMALLS v. North Charleston Police Department et al
as 2:2024cv01713
Plaintiff:
THERRAN RASHEED SMALLS
Defendant:
North Charleston Police Department, Officer Adams, Officer Jellico and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Santos v. South Carolina, The State of
as 6:2024cv01712
Plaintiff:
Eliseo Santos
Defendant:
South Carolina, The State of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
