Cases 91 - 99 of 99
GATES v. SYNTHES, INC. et al
as 1:2008cv00500
Plaintiff:
CAROL GATES
Defendant:
SYNTHES, INC., SYNTHES (U.S.A.), SYNTHES NORTH AMERICA, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
MCQUEEN v. MIDDLE DISTRICT OF N.C. (U.S.A.)
as 1:2008cv00279
Petitioner:
TONY DEWAYNE MCQUEEN
Respondent:
MIDDLE DISTRICT OF N.C. (U.S.A.)
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
DAVIS v. BEAZER HOMES, U.S.A. INC. et al
as 1:2008cv00247
Plaintiff:
REGINA DAVIS and REGINA DAVIS
Defendant:
BEAZER HOMES, U.S.A. INC., BEAZER HOMES CORP. and BEAZER MORTGAGE CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Pope v. Home Depot U.S.A., Inc.
as 5:2008cv00020
Plaintiff:
Janice Pope
Defendant:
Home Depot U.S.A., Inc.
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Everlight U.S.A., Inc. v. Carotrans International, Inc.
as 3:2008cv00053
Defendant:
Carotrans International, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Everlight U.S.A., Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal
SOUTH ATLANTIC LUMBER INDUSTRIES, INC. v. HOME DEPOT U.S.A., INC.
as 1:2007cv00319
Plaintiff:
SOUTH ATLANTIC LUMBER INDUSTRIES, INC.
Defendant:
HOME DEPOT U.S.A., INC., HOME DEPOT U.S.A., INC. and HOME DEPOT U.S.A., INC.
Mediator:
THOMAS C. DUNCAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Chevron U.S.A. Inc. et al v. SMITH
as 1:2007cv00122
Plaintiff:
Chevron U.S.A. Inc. and Chevron Intellectual Property LLC
Defendant:
Judy Smith
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051 Trademark Infringement
Chevron U.S.A. Inc. et al v. SMITH
as 3:2007cv00150
Plaintiff:
Chevron U.S.A. Inc. and CHEVRON INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY LLC
Defendant:
JUDY SMITH
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051 Trademark Infringement
Chevron U.S.A. Inc. et al v. Stocks, et al.,
as 2:2007cv00006
Plaintiff:
Chevron U.S.A. Inc. and Chevron Intellectual Property LLC
Defendant:
Stocks, Angela, Stocks, Roy Alton Jr. and North East Oil Company, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051 Trademark Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
