Cases 101 - 110 of 137
Kenneth Barbour v. Virginia Department of Correct
as 10-6012
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KENNETH EDWARD BARBOUR
Defendant - Appellee:
VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, at WRSP
Kenneth Barbour v. Representative of the persons
as 09-8230
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KENNETH EDWARD BARBOUR
Defendant - Appellee:
REPRESENTATIVE OF THE PERSONS ASST. WARDEN HARVEY
Kenneth Barbour v. M. Stanford
as 09-8218
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KENNETH EDWARD BARBOUR
Defendant - Appellee:
M. STANFORD, R.N., R. M. GARNERT, DOCTOR LEE and others
In Re: Kenneth Barbour
as 09-8178
Appellant:
In re: KENNETH EDWARD BARBOUR
Petitioner - None:
CHRISTOPHER GEORGE WASHINGTON
Respondent - Appellee:
WALLENS RIDGE STATE PRISON
Kenneth Barbour v. Western Regional Director
as 09-8068
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KENNETH EDWARD BARBOUR
Defendant - Appellee:
WESTERN REGIONAL DIRECTOR, VDOC, WARDEN, B. J. RAVIZEE and others
Kenneth Barbour v. Lt. Schlobohm
as 09-8024
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KENNETH EDWARD BARBOUR
Defendant - Appellee:
LT. SCHLOBOHM, INST. OMBUDSMAN and REGIONAL OMBUDSMAN
Barbour v. Schlobohm et al
as 7:2009cv00422
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Edward Barbour
Defendant:
Schlobohm, Inst. Ombudsman and Regional Ombudsman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kenneth Barbour v. Virginia Department of Correct
as 09-7800
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KENNETH EDWARD BARBOUR
Defendant - Appellee:
VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Barbour v. Collins et al
as 7:2009cv00393
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Edward Barbour
Defendant:
W.A. Collins, Cochrane, Collins M. Hensley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Barbour v. Legislation upon Virginia Dept. of Corrections
as 7:2009cv00324
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Edward Barbour
Defendant:
Legislation upon Virginia Dept. of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
