Cases 11 - 20 of 120
Skinner v. SmithKline Beecham et al
as 1:2013cv00686
Plaintiff:
Melvin Skinner
Defendant:
Corporation SmithKline Beecham and GlaxoSmithKline
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Grob v. SmithKline Beecham Corporation
as 1:2013cv00459
Plaintiff:
Anne Grob
Defendant:
Smithkline Beecham Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Glaxo Group Limited et al v. Kappos
as 1:2012cv01481
Plaintiff:
Glaxo Group Limited , SmithKline Beecham Limited and Glaxosmithkline Consumer Healthcare GMBH & Co. KG
Defendant:
David J. Kappos
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 154 AIA Appeal of Patent Term Adjustment Determination
Harder et al v. SmithKline Beecham Corporation et al
as 8:2012cv03614
Plaintiff:
Harry H Harder and Eileen V Harder
Defendant:
SmithKline Beecham Corporation and Glaxosmithkline LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Donofrio v. SmithKline Beecham Corporation
as 6:2012cv02108
Plaintiff:
Louis Donofrio
Defendant:
SmithKline Beecham Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
West v. SmithKline Beecham Corporation
as 6:2012cv02049
Plaintiff:
William West
Defendant:
SmithKline Beecham Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
McConnell v. SmithKline Beecham Corporation
as 6:2012cv02042
Plaintiff:
James McConnell
Defendant:
SmithKline Beecham Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Langston v. SmithKline Beecham Corporation
as 6:2012cv02040
Plaintiff:
Mildred Langston
Defendant:
SmithKline Beecham Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Holder v. SmithKline Beecham Corporation
as 6:2012cv02027
Plaintiff:
Roger Holder
Defendant:
SmithKline Beecham Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Kehle v. SmithKline Beecham Corporation
as 6:2012cv02034
Plaintiff:
James Gene Kehle
Defendant:
SmithKline Beecham Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
