Cases 11 - 20 of 20
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv02794
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv02796
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv02795
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2019cv01135
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv00116
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Farrell v. Cornerstone Financial Services et al.
as 1:2018cv02932
Plaintiff:
Christinia Farrell
Defendant:
CORNERSTONE FINANCIAL SERVICES and John Does 1-25
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Hanley et al v. Doctors Express Franchising LLC et al
as 1:2012cv00795
Plaintiff:
Raymond V Hanley , Marsha E Hanley and Hanley Limited Partners, LLC
Defendant:
Doctors Express Franchising, LLC, Peter Ross, Anthony J Bonacuse and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Walters v. Prince Georges Co et al
as 1:2008cv00711
Defendant:
Md Prince Georges Co, Md-Police Dept Of Prince Georges Co, Chief of Police for Prince George's County and others
Plaintiff:
Tania Nakya Walters
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Walters v. Prince Georges Co et al
as 8:2008cv00711
Defendant:
Md Prince Georges Co, Md-Police Dept Of Prince Georges Co, Chief of Police for Prince George's County and others
Plaintiff:
Tania Nakya Walters
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
v. Prince Georges Co et al
as 1:2008cv00710
Defendant:
Md Prince Georges Co, Md-Police Dept Of Prince Georges Co, Prince Goerge'S Co. Chief Of Police and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
