Cases filed in South Carolina
Cases 11 - 19 of 19
Shealey v. Mosley
as 1:2018cv01978
Respondent: B. Mosley
Petitioner: Donald Stanton Shealey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Beadle et al v. Stanton et al
as 4:2018cv00877
Plaintiff: Craig Beadle and Susanna Beadle
Defendant: Justin D Stanton and Southern Beverage Services LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Shealy v. Moseley We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2018cv00257
Petitioner: Donald Stanton Shealy
Respondent: Bonita Moseley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Carver v. Med-Trans Air Medical Transport et al
as 7:2017cv01384
Plaintiff: Julie Carver
Defendant: Med-Trans Air Medical Transport , Cherokee County Emergency Medical Service, John Stanton and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2016cv01585
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12117
Stanton v. Pfizer Inc
as 2:2015cv04418
Plaintiff: Florene Stanton
Defendant: Pfizer Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Mary Stanton et al v. Pfizer Inc et al
as 2:2014cv02319
Plaintiff: Mary Stanton , Gloria Pegram , Dorothy Thompson and others
Defendant: Pfizer Inc , McKesson Corporation and Does
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Stanton v. Volume Transportation et al
as 8:2009cv01165
Plaintiff: Barbara A Stanton
Defendant: Volume Transportation, Universal Trucking Benefits Association and American Public Life Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Type: Labor None
Cordle et al v. Apartment Investment and Management Company et al
as 7:2007cv02175
Plaintiff: Harold Cordle, David Alvey, David Anderson and others
Defendant: Apartment Investment and Management Company, AIMCO Properties LP and NHP Management Inc
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 206 Collect Unpaid Wages

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?