Cases 11 - 20 of 28
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv01916
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Allstate Insurance Company v. Phillips et al
as 1:2019cv01034
Defendant:
Uptown Realty Co., Stanley Rochkind, Uptown Realty Co. Limited Partnership and others
Plaintiff:
Allstate Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hicks et al v. Pep-Up, Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv00678
Defendant:
Walton Golman and Pep-Up, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Dayna Hicks and Terry Byrd
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Trustees of the National Asbestos Workers Medical Fund et al v. Wrap It Up Construction, LLC
as 1:2018cv01911
Plaintiff:
Trustees of the National Asbestos Workers Medical Fund and Trustees of the National Asbestos Workers Pension Fund
Defendant:
Wrap It Up Construction, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Allstate Insurance Company v. Uptown Realty Company et al
as 1:2017cv02749
Plaintiff:
Allstate Insurance Company
Defendant:
Uptown Realty Company, UP-1, LLC, Stanley Rochkind and others
Cause Of Action: 5 U.S.C. § 8705
Johnson v. United Parcel Service, Inc. (UPS)
as 1:2017cv01771
Plaintiff:
Khalilah Johnson
Defendant:
United Parcel Service, Inc. (UPS)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Johnson v. United Parcel Service, Inc. (UPS)
as 1:2017cv01546
Plaintiff:
Michael W. Johnson
Defendant:
United Parcel Service, Inc. (UPS)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Bertucco v. UPS Ground Freight, Inc.
as 1:2016cv03042
Plaintiff:
Jennifer L. Bertucco
Defendant:
UPS Ground Freight, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv03183
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2012cv03183
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
