Cases 11 - 20 of 140,769
Nicholas v. Fairmont State Police et al
as 5:2024cv00120
Plaintiff:
James Nicholas
Defendant:
Fairmont State Police and Steven Fitz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Warden et al v. American Express National Bank
as 3:2024cv00313
Plaintiff:
Mandy Warden and Richard Warden, IV
Defendant:
American Express National Bank
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Tryon v. Snowshoe Mountain, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv00015
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Tryon
Defendant:
Snowshoe Mountain, Inc. and Alterra Mountain Company U.S., Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Walsh et al v. The City of Clarksburg
as 1:2024cv00064
Plaintiff:
Mark Walsh, Neal Aldrich, Frank Barberio and others
Defendant:
The City of Clarksburg
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Grammer v. Cutright
as 1:2024cv00312
Petitioner:
Susan Diane Grammer
Respondent:
C. Cutright
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Brown v. Farrell et al
as 3:2024cv00309
Plaintiff:
Michael E. Brown
Defendant:
Paul T. Farrell, Tim Armstead, Elizabeth D. Walker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Womack v. Transportation Commodities, Inc.
as 3:2024cv00311
Plaintiff:
Brian D. Womack
Defendant:
Transportation Commodities, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 77 U.S.C. § 7777 Civil Shell Case Opening
Hedrick v. Raliegh North Carolina P.D. et al
as 3:2024cv00077
Petitioner:
Micheal Hedrick
Respondent:
Raliegh North Carolina P.D. et al
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Nicholas v. White et al
as 2:2024cv00308
Plaintiff:
James Lee Nicholas
Defendant:
Ron White and Josha Dowing
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Warden
as 1:2024cv00310
Petitioner:
LaDonna Jones
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
