Cases 21 - 30 of 127
Owaiian Jones v. Rappahannock Regional Jail
as 15-7771
Plaintiff - Appellant:
OWAIIAN M. JONES
Defendant - Appellee:
RAPPAHANNOCK REGIONAL JAIL, JOHN DOES, JOSEPH HIGGS and others
Jones v. Rappahannock Regional Jail et al
as 1:2015cv01460
Plaintiff:
Owaiian M. Jones
Defendant:
Rappahannock Regional Jail and Joseph Higgs
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. USMS et al
as 1:2015cv01456
Plaintiff:
Owaiian M. Jones
Defendant:
USMS, FBI, DEA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Rappahannock Regional Jail et al
as 1:2015cv01433
Plaintiff:
Owaiian M. Jones
Defendant:
Rappahannock Regional Jail, Joseph Higgs, John Does and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Majority of caucasin staff et al
as 1:2015cv01439
Plaintiff:
Owaiian M. Jones
Defendant:
Majority of caucasin staff, Rappahannock Regional Jail, Daily and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones et al v. Rappahannock Regional Jail et al
as 1:2015cv01436
Plaintiff:
Owaiian M. Jones and Justin Patrick Curry
Defendant:
Rappahannock Regional Jail, Joseph Higgs, John Does and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Rappahannock Regional Jail et al
as 1:2015cv01434
Plaintiff:
Owaiian M. Jones
Defendant:
Rappahannock Regional Jail, Joseph Higgs, Edwards and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Higgs et al
as 1:2015cv01418
Plaintiff:
Owaiian M. Jones
Defendant:
Joseph Higgs, John Does, Roanoke City Jail, John Does, Fairfax County Jail and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Rappahannock Regional Jail et al
as 1:2015cv01369
Plaintiff:
Owaiian M. Jones
Defendant:
Rappahannock Regional Jail, John Does, Joseph Higgs and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Higgs, et al
as 1:2015cv01368
Plaintiff:
Owaiian M. Jones
Defendant:
Joseph Higgs, Jr. and Bow Buford
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
