Cases 21 - 30 of 500
Seay et al v. State of West Virginia et al
as 3:2023cv00054
Plaintiff:
Marilyn E Seay Propst, Charles Propst, Kathy Propst and others
Defendant:
State of West Virginia, Jerry Moore, Jeff Bowers and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Moore v. Ramo's et al
as 1:2023cv01364
Plaintiff:
Marvin Maurice Moore
Defendant:
Ramo's, Treachy and Focus
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Bivens Prisoner
Casey v. Williams et al
as 7:2023cv00587
Plaintiff:
Adam Nicholas Casey
Defendant:
Nancie Williams, Angela M. Moore, Jon Zug and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Driggs et. al. v. Central Intelligence Agency
as 1:2023cv01124
Plaintiff:
Michael Driggs, Robert Moore, Jana Orear and others
Defendant:
POW Investigative Project, Inc. and Central Intelligence Agency
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
Moore v. Bennett et al
as 1:2023cv00026
Plaintiff:
Johmal W. Moore
Defendant:
Adrian B. Bennett, Arka Express, Inc., BJT Express, Inc. doing business as Bullpen Express, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Moore v. Doe
as 7:2023cv00499
Plaintiff:
Keyanta Lamont Moore
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Moore v. Harrison
as 7:2023cv00498
Plaintiff:
Keyanta Lamont Moore
Defendant:
Lt. Harrison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Moore v. Doe
as 7:2023cv00496
Plaintiff:
Keyanta Lamont Moore
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Moore v. Warden at KMCC
as 7:2023cv00493
Plaintiff:
Keyanta Lamont Moore
Defendant:
Warden at KMCC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Moore v. Fleming, et al.
as 7:2023cv00495
Plaintiff:
Keyanta Lamont Moore
Defendant:
Investigator Fleming and Investigator Rasnake
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
