Cases 21 - 30 of 1,054
Johnson v. The State of South Carolina et al
as 4:2024cv03303
Defendant:
The State of South Carolina, Robert L. Stuckes and Jeremiah S. Freeman
Plaintiff:
Devin Rashad Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Bedford v. State of South Carolina
as 5:2024cv01680
Petitioner:
Emanual Aurmond Bedford
Respondent:
State of South Carolina
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Kimner v. State of South Carolina, The et al
as 2:2024cv01966
Plaintiff:
Audrey L. Kimner
Defendant:
State of South Carolina, The, Berkeley County South Carolina and William J. Wylie, Jr.,
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr (Other)
Roberts, Jr. v. State of South Carolina
as 2:2024cv01720
Plaintiff:
Emory W. Roberts, Jr.
Defendant:
State of South Carolina
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hoffman Electric, Inc. v. Federal Highway Administration et al
as 3:2024cv02854
Defendant:
State of South Carolina and US Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration and South Carolina Department of Transportation
Plaintiff:
Hoffman Electric, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
Maner v. State of South Carolina
as 8:2024cv02626
Petitioner:
Derek Maner
Respondent:
State of South Carolina and Warden of Kershaw Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Dover v. State of South Carolina, The
as 7:2024cv01807
Plaintiff:
Roderick Shawn Dale Dover
Defendant:
State of South Carolina, The
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Gonzalez v. State of South Carolina et al
as 6:2024cv02850
Plaintiff:
Uriel Romero Gonzalez
Defendant:
State of South Carolina and The Thirteenth Circuit of H District
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
In re: Aqueous Film-Forming Foams Products
as 24-1270
Not Yet Classified:
In re: AQUEOUS FILM-FORMING FOAMS PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Plaintiff:
STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA EX REL ALAN WILSON, ATTORNEY GENERAL, in his official capacity as Attorney General of the State of South Carolina
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, CORTEVA INC., DUPONT DE NEMOURS INC., New DuPont and others
Moore v. State of South Carolina
as 4:2024cv01753
Petitioner:
Charles B. Moore, Jr.
Respondent:
State of South Carolina
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
