Cases 31 - 40 of 70
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2014cv03594
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
Osborne v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority
as 8:2014cv02970
Plaintiff:
Felicia D. Osborne
Defendant:
Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Kellaher v. Rouse
as 1:2014cv01657
Plaintiff:
William Kellaher, III
Defendant:
Felicia Lynn Rouse
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Rafa-El v. Obama et al
as 1:2014cv01286
Plaintiff:
Raaj Rafa-El
Defendant:
Barack Obama, Eric Holder, Martin O'Malley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Barnes v. MRDCC et al
as 8:2013cv03142
Plaintiff:
Juan Sylvester Barnes
Defendant:
Janet Riddick and Felicia Hinton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Agurs v. Hinton et al
as 1:2013cv01988
Petitioner:
Calvin Agurs
Respondent:
Felicia M. Hinton, Solomon Hejirik Sr and The Attorney General of the State of Maryland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv01655
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Naturalization Hearing
Holsey v. Alston et al
as 1:2013cv00994
Plaintiff:
Aaron Holsey
Defendant:
Corless Alston, D. Miller-Ford, Paul T. Graziano and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Housing Discrimination
Moore et al v. Svehlak et al
as 1:2012cv02727
Plaintiff:
Charles E. Moore and Felicia W. Moore
Defendant:
Robert S. Svehlak , Neil D. Roseman , Beverly J. Svehlak and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Amato et al v. SNAP Telecommunications, Inc. et al
as 1:2012cv02410
Plaintiff:
Alexandra Amato , Darick Finke , Sherri Fleishell and others
Defendant:
SNAP Telecommunications, Inc. and Tom Kielty
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
