Cases filed in the Fourth Circuit Courts
Cases 31 - 40 of 52
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2013cv03011
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Rochester v. Harwell et al
as 6:2013cv02212
Plaintiff: Julian E Rochester
Defendant: R B Harwell, K F McDonald, H M Herlong and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Rochester v. Nettles et al
as 6:2013cv01407
Plaintiff: Julian E Rochester
Defendant: W Nettles, R Carter, J Roberts and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2013cv00492
Petitioner: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2013cv00024
Petitioner: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2012cv03405
Petitioner: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2012cv03262
Petitioner: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Rochester v. Laubshire et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 6:2012cv00236
Plaintiff: Julian E Rochester
Defendant: M V Laubshire, William R Byars, Jon Ozmint and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
180s, Inc. et al v. H&M Hennes & Mauritz L.P.
as 1:2010cv03358
Plaintiff: 180s, Inc. and 180S, LLC
Defendant: H&M Hennes & Mauritz L.P.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
180S, Inc. et al v. H&M Hennes & Mauritz L.P.
as 1:2010cv03361
Plaintiff: 180S, Inc. and 180S, LLC
Defendant: H&M Hennes & Mauritz L.P.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?