Cases 31 - 40 of 153
Stern v. Bartee et al
as 7:2023cv00154
Plaintiff:
Joseph Michael Stern
Defendant:
Mrs. Bartee, Transportation Authority, Dillwyn Correctional Center and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00200
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Stricklin v. Young et al
as 7:2023cv00085
Plaintiff:
Paul Arthur Stricklin, Jr.
Defendant:
Superintendant Young, Captain Powell, Captain Lloyd and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Simmons v. Kidd, et al.
as 3:2023cv00041
Plaintiff:
Ja'Kai Simmons
Defendant:
LT. Kidd, Captain Lucy, Major Allen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wishom v. Anderson et al
as 3:2023cv00026
Plaintiff:
Christian Amadi Wishom
Defendant:
Superintendent Anderson and Captain Mac
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv01243
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cook v. Corbin et al
as 7:2022cv00631
Plaintiff:
Clinton S. Cook
Defendant:
Sgt. Corbin, Officer Landis, Northwestern Regional Jail and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cobb v. Haug et al
as 7:2022cv00610
Plaintiff:
Raymond Michael Cobb
Defendant:
Superintendant Hoag, Lisa Ferguson, Lt. Hatley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tiller v. Clear et al
as 7:2022cv00456
Plaintiff:
Leonard Cody Tiller
Defendant:
Superintendent Stephen O. Clear, Major Chad Kilgore and Capt. Todd Tutum
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Halter v. Middle River Regional Jail Authorities et al
as 7:2022cv00375
Plaintiff:
Daniel Norbert Halter
Defendant:
Middle River Regional Jail Authorities, Augusta County, Rockingham County and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
