Cases 41 - 50 of 72
Kenneth Barbour v. Collins, et al
as 10-6022
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KENNETH EDWARD BARBOUR
Defendant - Appellee:
C/O W.A. COLLINS, SGT. COCHRANE, LT. COLLINS M. HENSLEY and others
Michael Hancock v. B. Watson
as 09-8200
Petitioner - Appellant:
MICHAEL TODD HANCOCK
Respondent - Appellee:
B. WATSON, Warden, Wallens Ridge State Prison and GENE JOHNSON, Director, Virginia Department of Corrections
Anthony Brown v. Gene Johnson
as 09-8169
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANTHONY MALIK BROWN
Defendant - Appellee:
GENE JOHNSON and B. WATSON
Michael Hancock v. B. Watson
as 09-8094
Petitioner - Appellant:
MICHAEL TODD HANCOCK
Respondent - Appellee:
B. WATSON, Warden, Wallens Ridge State Prison and GENE JOHNSON, Director, Virginia Department of Corrections
Brown v. Johnson et al
as 7:2009cv00429
Plaintiff:
Anthony Malik Brown
Defendant:
Gene Johnson and B. Watson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Barbour v. Collins et al
as 7:2009cv00393
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Edward Barbour
Defendant:
W.A. Collins, Cochrane, Collins M. Hensley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Washington v. Watson et al
as 7:2009cv00375
Plaintiff:
Christopher Washington
Defendant:
B. Watson, Herion and A. Delph
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Spencer Stacey v. Gene Johnson
as 09-7455
Petitioner - Appellant:
SPENCER LAMONT STACEY
Respondent - Appellee:
GENE JOHNSON, Director and B. WATSON
Muwwakkil v. Johnson et al
as 7:2009cv00318
Plaintiff:
Kamal S. Muwwakkil
Defendant:
Gene M. Johnson, Larry Huffman, John S. Garman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stacey v. Johnson
as 7:2009cv00317
Petitioner:
Spencer L. Stacey
Respondent:
Gene Johnson and B. Watson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
