Cases 41 - 50 of 62
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2014cv00352
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2013cv00670
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Carter v. Duke et al
as 1:2013cv00898
Plaintiff:
Angelo M. Carter
Defendant:
Ms. Duke and Joycetine Boore
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Timber Treatment Technologies, LLC et al v. Hagstrom et al
as 3:2013cv00207
Plaintiff:
Timber Treatment Technologies, LLC and ARV Labs, LLC
Defendant:
Paula T. Hagstrom, Modulus Holdings, Inc., Jonathan K. Duke and others
Counter_defendant:
Timber Treatment Technologies, LLC , ARV Labs, LLC , Karen Slimak and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 - Petition for Removal: SEC Act
Belcher v. Myatt et al
as 7:2012cv00346
Plaintiff:
Peter Terry Belcher
Defendant:
Bridget A. Dickert, ATF Special Agent Duke, Willa J. Faris and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Dukes v. Wilson
as 7:2011cv00530
Plaintiff:
Clarence Dukes
Defendant:
Richard Wilson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dukes v. Wilson
as 1:2011cv01133
Plaintiff:
Clarence Dukes
Defendant:
Richard Wilson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis v. State of North Carolina et al
as 2:2011cv00500
Plaintiff:
William Scott Davis, Jr.
Defendant:
State of North Carolina, Beaverly Perdue, Melanie A. Shekita and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Shouse v. King et al
as 2:2011cv00464
Plaintiff:
Jacob Shouse
Defendant:
T. King, H. Soloria, K. Ryder and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Grandison v. Food Lion, LLC et al
as 4:2011cv00080
Plaintiff:
Gwendolyn Grandison
Defendant:
Food Lion, LLC , Pam-Joy Realty, Inc. and Elizabeth Duke
Cross_claimant:
Pam-Joy Realty, Inc.
Cross_defendant:
Food Lion, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
