Cases 41 - 50 of 119
James Gibson v. J. Stouffer
as 14-7214
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES MAXWELL GIBSON
Defendant - Appellee:
J. MICHAEL STOUFFER, Former Commissioner of Corrections, GREGG L. HERSHBERGER, Warden, KATHLEEN GREEN, Warden and others
Owens v. Hershberger
as 1:2014cv02582
Plaintiff:
Darnell Jose Owens
Defendant:
Gregg Hershberger
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Marshall v. Hershberger et al
as 8:2014cv02475
Plaintiff:
Gregory Marshall
Defendant:
Gregg L. Hershberger, Joseph Ebbitt and John Moss
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Marshall v. Stouffer et al
as 8:2014cv02395
Plaintiff:
Gregory Marshall
Defendant:
J. Michael Stouffer and Gregg L. Hershberger
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
French v. Corizon et al
as 1:2014cv02263
Plaintiff:
Mark French
Defendant:
Corizon, Colin Ottey, Ava Joubert and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brooks v. Wexford Medical Health Care Provider et al
as 8:2014cv02209
Plaintiff:
Joseph J. Brooks
Defendant:
Wexford Medical Health Care Provider, Hershberger, Bishop and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Schaechtel v. Maryland Division of Correction et al
as 8:2014cv02099
Plaintiff:
Johnny J. Schaechtel
Defendant:
Maryland Division of Correction, Greeg L. Hershberger, Jessup Correctional Institution and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Chase v. Hershberger et al
as 1:2014cv02102
Plaintiff:
Warren Chase
Defendant:
Gregg L. Hershberger and Mark J. Carter
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jalloh v. Simmons et al
as 1:2014cv02024
Plaintiff:
Siaka Tejan Jalloh
Defendant:
Melissa Simmons, E. Orndoff, J. Wilson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Aaron Roberts v. Corey Walker
as 14-6896
Plaintiff - Appellant:
AARON B. ROBERTS
Defendant - Appellee:
COREY WALKER, CCMSII, R. EBERSOLE, Lt., A. HARTLE, COMSII and others
Defendant:
DOCTOR LIN QUILLO, DOCTOR KEVEN JOHNSON and RN MICHELLE AUTREY
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
